CEGT Forum
Würden Sie gerne auf diese Nachricht reagieren? Erstellen Sie einen Account in wenigen Klicks oder loggen Sie sich ein, um fortzufahren.

testing: Naum 4.6 x64

Nach unten

testing: Naum 4.6 x64 Empty testing: Naum 4.6 x64

Beitrag von Gerhard Sonnabend Mo Sep 29, 2014 9:56 am

Naum 4.6 x64 (new @ CEGT 5'+3" pb=on)

vs Komodo 8.0 x64         [3149]   8.0-42.0  perf=2861  [W.B.]
vs Houdini 4.0 x64        [3143]  12.5-37.5  perf=2952  [W.B.]
vs Stockfish 5.0 x64      [3142]   9.5-40.5  perf=2890  [W.S.]
vs Komodo 7.0a x64        [3108]  15.0-35.0  perf=2961  [W.B.]
vs Stockfish DD x64       [3103]  11.5-38.5  perf=2894  [W.B.]
vs Houdini 3.0 x64        [3100]  13.0-37.0  perf=2918  [G.S.]
vs Gull 3.0 x64           [3083]  17.5-32.5  perf=2975  [G.S.]
vs Komodo TCEC x64        [3082]  10.0-00.0  perf=2841  [W.B.]
vs Komodo 6.0 x64         [3081]  14.5-35.5  perf=2925  [G.S.]
vs Gull 2.8 beta x64      [3051]  13.0-37.0  perf=2869  [G.S.]
vs Komodo 5.1r2 x64       [3050]  13.5-36.5  perf=2877  [W.B.]
vs Stockfish 4.0 x64      [3048]  14.5-35.5  perf=2892  [W.B.]
vs Equinox 3.00 x64       [3024]  13.0-37.0  perf=2842  [G.S.]
vs Critter 1.6 x64        [3016]  15.5-34.5  perf=2871  [W.B.]
vs Gull 2.2 x64           [3007]  14.5-35.5  perf=2851  [W.B.]
vs Equinox 2.01 x64       [2999]  17.0-33.0  perf=2884  [G.S.]
vs Rybka 4.1 x64          [2971]  19.0-31.0  perf=2886  [G.S.]
vs BlackMamba 1.4 x64     [2940]  23.0-27.0  perf=2912  [W.B.]
vs Deep Fritz 14 x64      [2926]  21.0-29.0  perf=2870  [W.S.]
vs Chiron 2.0 x64         [2914]  19.5-30.5  perf=2836  [G.S.]
vs Protector 1.6.0 x64    [2890]  22.5-27.5  perf=2855  [G.S.]
vs Hannibal 1.4a x64      [2868]  28.5-21.0  perf=2917  [G.S.]
vs Chiron 1.5 x64         [2863]  27.0-23.0  perf=2891  [W.B.]
vs Texel 1.04 x64         [2850]  27.0-23.0  perf=2878  [W.B.]
vs Loop 2010-x x64        [2846]  27.5-22.5  perf=2881  [G.S.]
vs Senpai 1.0 x64         [2846]  30.0-20.0  perf=2916  [W.B.]
vs Protector 1.5.0 x64    [2844]  27.0-23.0  perf=2872  [W.B.]
vs Hiarcs 14              [2837]  28.5-21.5  perf=2886  [G.S.]
vs Fritz 13               [2825]  25.0-25.0  perf=2825  [W.S.]
vs Deep Sjeng ct 2010 w32 [2804]  26.5-23.5  perf=2825  [W.B.]
vs Deep Shredder 12 x64   [2800]  33.0-17.0  perf=2915  [W.B.]
vs Texel 1.03 x64         [2796]  34.0-16.0  perf=2927  [W.B.]
vs Jonny 6.00 x64         [2792]  29.0-21.0  perf=2848  [W.B.]
vs Spike 1.4              [2775]  30.0-20.0  perf=2845  [W.B.]
vs iCE 2.0 v2240 x64      [2764]  33.5-16.5  perf=2887  [W.S.]
vs Deep Junior 13.3 x64   [2763]  32.5-17.5  perf=2871  [W.B.]
vs Spark 1.0 x64          [2760]  32.0-18.0  perf=2860  [W.B.]
vs DiscoCheck 5.2 x64     [2754]  35.5-14.5  perf=2910  [W.S.]
vs Booot 5.2.0 x64        [2750]  37.0-13.0  perf=2932  [G.S.]
vs Quazar 0.4 x64         [2745]  33.5-16.5  perf=2868  [W.B.]


117109 / 40 = Ø 2928
894.5 / 2000 = 44.7% = - 37

Projection by ELO-Stat 1.3 = 2891 out of 2000 games.

Projection by Ordo  v0.8-cegt23:

Naum 4.6 x64      2872 out of 1800 games  + 43
Naum 4.2 x64      2829 out of 2000 games

(perf=103757 / 36 = 2882 - ca. 10 = ca. 2872)

Best wishes,
G.S., W.S. and W.B.

Gerhard Sonnabend
Admin

Anzahl der Beiträge : 491
Anmeldedatum : 22.10.13
Alter : 58
Ort : Stuttgart

http://www.pcschach.de

Nach oben Nach unten

Nach oben


 
Befugnisse in diesem Forum
Sie können in diesem Forum nicht antworten