CEGT Forum
Würden Sie gerne auf diese Nachricht reagieren? Erstellen Sie einen Account in wenigen Klicks oder loggen Sie sich ein, um fortzufahren.

testing: Komodo 8.0 x64

Nach unten

testing: Komodo 8.0 x64 Empty testing: Komodo 8.0 x64

Beitrag von Gerhard Sonnabend So Aug 31, 2014 5:10 pm

Komodo 8.0 x64

vs Houdini 4.0 x64 [3146] 31.5-18.5 perf=3238 [W.B.]
vs Stockfish 5.0 x64 [3142] 22.5-27.5 perf=3107 [G.S.]
vs Stockfish DD x64 [3103] 30.0-20.0 perf=3173 [W.B.]
vs Houdini 3.0 x64 [3098] 31.0-19.0 perf=3183 [G.S.]
vs Gull 3.0 x64 [3083] 32.0-18.0 perf=3183 [W.B.]
vs Gull 2.8 beta x64 [3049] 31.5-18.5 perf=3141 [G.S.]
vs Stockfish 4.0 x64 [3047] 31.5-18.5 perf=3139 [W.B.]
vs Equinox 3.00 x64 [3022] 31.0-19.0 perf=3107 [G.S.]
vs Critter 1.6 x64 [3015] 34.5-15.5 perf=3154 [W.B.]
vs Gull 2.2 x64 [3004] 34.0-16.0 perf=3135 [W.B.]
vs Equinox 2.01 x64 [3000] 39.5-10.5 perf=3230 [W.B.]
vs Rybka 4.1 x64 [2970] 36.5-13.5 perf=3143 [G.S.]
vs BlackMamba 1.4 x64 [2937] 37.5-12.5 perf=3128 [G.S.]
vs Deep Fritz 14 x64 [2921] 35.0-15.0 perf=3068 [W.S.]
vs Chiron 2.0 x64 [2911] 42.0- 8.0 perf=3199 [G.S.]
vs Protector 1.6.0 x64 [2888] 42.5- 7.5 perf=3189 [W.B.]
vs Hannibal 1.4a x64 [2865] 39.0-11.0 perf=3085 [G.S.]
vs Chiron 1.5 x64 [2861] 42.0- 8.0 perf=3149 [W.S.]
vs Texel 1.04 x64 [2849] 41.0- 9.0 perf=3112 [G.S.]
vs Loop 2010-x x64 [2844] 41.5- 8.5 perf=3119 [G.S.]
vs Senpai 1.0 x64 [2842] 42.0- 8.0 perf=3130 [G.S.]
vs Protector 1.5.0 x64 [2842] 41.5- 8.5 perf=3117 [G.S.]
vs Hiarcs 14 [2836] 43.0- 7.0 perf=3151 [G.S.]
vs Naum 4.2 x64 [2826] 42.0- 8.0 perf=3114 [G.S.]
vs Fritz 13 [2821] 41.5- 8.5 perf=3096 [W.S.]
vs Deep Sjeng ct 2010 w32 [2802] 41.0- 9.0 perf=3065 [G.S.]
vs Deep Shredder 12 x64 [2800] 42.0- 8.0 perf=3088 [G.S.]
vs Texel 1.03 x64 [2794] 46.5- 3.5 perf=3243 [G.S.]
vs Jonny 6.00 x64 [2789] 43.0- 7.0 perf=3090 [W.B.]
vs Spike 1.4 [2774] 45.5- 4.5 perf=3176 [G.S.]
vs Deep Junior 13.3 x64 [2761] 46.0- 4.0 perf=3185 [W.B.]
vs Spark 1.0 x64 [2757] 44.0- 6.0 perf=3103 [G.S.]
vs DiscoCheck 5.2 x64 [2750] 44.0- 6.0 perf=3096 [W.B.]
vs Booot 5.2.0 x64 [2747] 45.5- 4.5 perf=3149 [W.B.]
vs Quazar 0.4 x64 [2743] 45.0- 5.0 perf=3125 [W.B.]

101639 / 35 = Ø 2903
1358.5 / 1750 = 78.6% = + 216

Our projection (by ELO-Stat 1.3) = 3119 out of 1750 games.


Calculation by Ordo v0.8-cegt23 so far (TOP-5 only) after 1700 games:


# Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
1 Komodo 8.0 x64 3149 15 15 1700 78.6 % 2896 31.9 %
2 Houdini 4.0 x64 3141 14 14 1900 75.7 % 2917 31.7 %
3 Stockfish 5.0 x64 3141 15 15 1800 76.8 % 2906 35.2 %
4 Komodo 7.0a x64 3106 14 14 1750 73.8 % 2903 36.3 %
5 Stockfish DD x64 3101 13 13 1850 72.1 % 2913 38.5 %


Best wishes,
G.S., W.S. and W.B.

Gerhard Sonnabend
Admin

Anzahl der Beiträge : 491
Anmeldedatum : 22.10.13
Alter : 58
Ort : Stuttgart

http://www.pcschach.de

Nach oben Nach unten

Nach oben


 
Befugnisse in diesem Forum
Sie können in diesem Forum nicht antworten