testing: iCE 2.0 v2240 x64
Seite 1 von 1
testing: iCE 2.0 v2240 x64
iCE 2.0 v2240 x64 (new @ CEGT 5'+3" pb=on)
vs Komodo 8.0 x64 [3147] 6.0-44.0 perf=2801 [W.B.]
vs Stockfish 5.0 x64 [3143] 10.5-39.5 perf=2913 [W.B.]
vs Houdini 4.0 x64 [3141] 6.0-44.0 perf=2795 [G.S.]
vs Komodo 7.0a x64 [3106] 8.0-42.0 perf=2818 [W.B.]
vs Stockfish DD x64 [3101] 7.5-42.5 perf=2800 [W.B.]
vs Houdini 3.0 x64 [3096] 5.5-44.5 perf=2733 [G.S.]
vs Gull 3.0 x64 [3081] 7.5-42.5 perf=2780 [W.B.]
vs Komodo TCEC x64 [3079] 6.5-43.5 perf=2749 [W.B.]
vs Komodo 6.0 x64 [3077] 5.0-45.0 perf=2695 [W.B.]
vs Gull 2.8 beta x64 [3048] 6.5-43.5 perf=2718 [W.B.]
vs Stockfish 4.0 x64 [3046] 9.5-40.5 perf=2794 [W.B.]
vs Komodo 5.1r2 x64 [3046] 5.0-45.0 perf=2664 [W.B.]
vs Equinox 3.00 x64 [3022] 10.5-39.5 perf=2792 [G.S.]
vs Critter 1.6 x64 [3014] 10.5-39.5 perf=2784 [G.S.]
vs Gull 2.2 x64 [3004] 9.0-41.0 perf=2741 [W.B.]
vs Equinox 2.01 x64 [2997] 13.5-36.5 perf=2824 [G.S.]
vs Rybka 4.1 x64 [2969] 13.0-37.0 perf=2787 [G.S.]
vs BlackMamba 1.4 x64 [2937] 12.5-37.5 perf=2746 [G.S.]
vs Deep Fritz 14 x64 [2922] 11.0-39.0 perf=2702 [W.S.]
vs Chiron 2.0 x64 [2909] 10.5-39.5 perf=2679 [W.S.]
vs Protector 1.6.0 x64 [2887] 14.5-35.5 perf=2731 [W.B.]
vs Hannibal 1.4a x64 [2865] 17.5-32.5 perf=2757 [G.S.]
vs Chiron 1.5 x64 [2860] 17.0-33.0 perf=2745 [W.S.]
vs Texel 1.04 x64 [2849] 23.0-27.0 perf=2821 [G.S.]
vs Loop 2010-x x64 [2844] 21.0-29.0 perf=2788 [G.S.]
vs Senpai 1.0 x64 [2841] 16.5-33.5 perf=2718 [W.B.]
vs Protector 1.5.0 x64 [2841] 20.5-29.5 perf=2778 [G.S.]
vs Hiarcs 14 [2835] 22.0-28.0 perf=2793 [G.S.]
vs Naum 4.2 x64 [2826] 20.0-30.0 perf=2756 [W.B.]
vs Fritz 13 [2821] 18.5-31.5 perf=2729 [W.S.]
vs Deep Sjeng ct 2010 w32 [2803] 24.5-25.5 perf=2796 [W.B.]
vs Deep Shredder 12 x64 [2800] 29.0-21.0 perf=2856 [W.B.]
vs Texel 1.03 x64 [2792] 22.0-28.0 perf=2750 [W.B.]
vs Jonny 6.00 x64 [2789] 22.5-27.5 perf=2754 [W.B.]
vs Spike 1.4 [2773] 26.0-24.0 perf=2787 [W.B.]
vs Deep Junior 13.3 x64 [2759] 23.5-26.5 perf=2736 [W.B.]
vs Spark 1.0 x64 [2757] 23.5-26.5 perf=2736 [W.B.]
vs DiscoCheck 5.2 x64 [2750] 23.5-26.5 perf=2729 [W.S.]
vs Booot 5.2.0 x64 [2746] 25.0-25.0 perf=2746 [W.S.]
vs Quazar 0.4 x64 [2742] 27.0-23.0 perf=2770 [W.B.]
117065 / 40 = Ø 2926
611.0 / 2000 = 30.6% = - 143
Projection by ELO-Stat 1.3 = 2783 out of 2000 games.
Best wishes,
G.S., W.S. and W.B.
Ähnliche Themen
» Testing iCE 2.0 v2240
» Testing SlowChessClassic 2.2 x64
» Testing SlowChessClassic 2.0 x64
» testing ACE(2)TM
» Testing K2 v0.75
» Testing SlowChessClassic 2.2 x64
» Testing SlowChessClassic 2.0 x64
» testing ACE(2)TM
» Testing K2 v0.75
Seite 1 von 1
Befugnisse in diesem Forum
Sie können in diesem Forum nicht antworten
|
|