CEGT Forum
Würden Sie gerne auf diese Nachricht reagieren? Erstellen Sie einen Account in wenigen Klicks oder loggen Sie sich ein, um fortzufahren.

testing: Texel 1.04 x64

Nach unten

testing: Texel 1.04 x64 Empty testing: Texel 1.04 x64

Beitrag von Gerhard Sonnabend Fr Jun 13, 2014 9:24 am

Texel 1.04 x64
                      
vs Houdini 4.0 x64 [3104] 11.0-39.0 perf=2884 [W.S.]
vs Stockfish 5.0 x64 [3097] 7.5-42.5 perf=2796 [W.B.]
vs Komodo 7.0a x64 [3068] 10.0-40.0 perf=2827 [G.S.]
vs Stockfish DD x64 [3064] 13.0-37.0 perf=2882 [G.S.]
vs Houdini 3.0 x64 [3058] 8.5-41.5 perf=2783 [W.S.]
vs Komodo TCEC x64 [3044] 12.5-37.5 perf=2854 [W.B.]
vs Komodo 6.0 x64 [3041] 12.5-37.5 perf=2850 [W.S.]
vs Stockfish 4.0 x64 [3014] 15.0-35.0 perf=2867 [W.B.]
vs Gull 2.8 beta x64 [3014] 13.5-36.5 perf=2841 [W.S.]
vs Komodo 5.1r2 x64 [3012] 10.0-40.0 perf=2771 [W.S.]
vs Equinox 3.00 x64 [2988] 14.0-36.0 perf=2824 [W.B.]
vs Critter 1.6 x64 [2982] 14.5-35.5 perf=2826 [W.S.]
vs Gull 2.2 x64 [2974] 12.5-37.5 perf=2784 [W.B.]
vs Equinox 2.01 x64 [2972] 14.0-36.0 perf=2808 [G.S.]
vs Rybka 4.1 x64 [2946] 19.0-31.0 perf=2861 [G.S.]
vs BlackMamba 1.4 x64 [2916] 19.5-30.5 perf=2838 [W.B.]
vs Deep Fritz 14 x64 [2902] 19.0-31.0 perf=2817 [W.S.]
vs Chiron 2.0 x64 [2892] 17.0-33.0 perf=2777 [W.S.]
vs Protector 1.6.0 x64 [2874] 21.5-28.5 perf=2825 [G.S.]
vs Hannibal 1.4a x64 [2853] 22.5-27.5 perf=2818 [G.S.]
vs Chiron 1.5 x64 [2850] 21.5-28.5 perf=2801 [W.S.]
vs Loop 2010-x x64 [2837] 30.0-20.0 perf=2907 [G.S.]
vs Protector 1.5.0 x64 [2837] 31.5-18.5 perf=2929 [W.B.]
vs Senpai 1.0 x64 [2836] 29.5-20.5 perf=2899 [W.B.]
vs Hiarcs 14 [2829] 26.0-24.0 perf=2843 [W.S.]
vs Naum 4.2 x64 [2819] 23.0-27.0 perf=2791 [W.B.]
vs Fritz 13 [2814] 24.0-26.0 perf=2800 [W.S.]
vs Deep Shredder 12 x64 [2800] 32.0-18.0 perf=2900 [W.B.]
vs Deep Sjeng ct 2010 w32 [2796] 22.5-27.5 perf=2762 [W.B.]
vs Jonny 6.00 x64 [2788] 30.0-20.0 perf=2858 [G.S.]
vs Spike 1.4 [2773] 25.5-24.5 perf=2780 [G.S.]
vs Deep Junior 13.3 x64 [2762] 30.5-19.5 perf=2839 [W.B.]
vs Spark 1.0 x64 [2759] 31.5-18.5 perf=2851 [W.S.]
vs DiscoCheck 5.2 x64 [2754] 34.0-16.0 perf=2885 [W.S.]
vs Booot 5.2.0 x64 [2750] 31.5-18.5 perf=2842 [W.B.]
vs Quazar 0.4 x64 [2742] 26.5-23.5 perf=2763 [W.B.]
==============================================================
Texel 1.04 x64 ELO 2840 out of 1800 games (+ 48)
Texel 1.03 x64 ELO 2792 out of 1800 games
==============================================================

104561 / 36 = Ø 2904
736.5 / 1800 = 40.9% = - 64
Ø 2904 - 64 = 2840

Best wishes,
G.S., W.S. and W.B.

Gerhard Sonnabend
Admin

Anzahl der Beiträge : 510
Anmeldedatum : 22.10.13
Alter : 62
Ort : Stuttgart

http://www.pcschach.de

Nach oben Nach unten

Nach oben

- Ähnliche Themen

 
Befugnisse in diesem Forum
Sie können in diesem Forum nicht antworten